How to build a creative approval workflow people will actually use
A practical workflow for keeping the asset, feedback, current version, and final decision together.
Written by the Aproova product team from the review flows we build and test in the application.

Creative approval becomes difficult when the work and the conversation live in different places.
A reliable workflow does not need more meetings. It needs one current file, clear reviewers, feedback attached to the work, and a recorded decision.
Start with one visible review
Create a review for the asset or campaign package before asking for feedback. Give it an owner, a deadline when needed, and the people who must respond.
This makes the next action visible without asking the team which link or file is current.
Keep feedback on the work
Comments should point to the image area, PDF page, or video moment they describe. The reviewer can still use email or chat to notify the team, but the actual change request stays with the asset.
End every round with a decision
A new version, an approval, or a request for changes should close the round. Recording that action keeps the history useful when the campaign returns weeks later.
Give each person a clear job
The person uploading the work explains what this round is for. Reviewers point out questions or changes. A decision maker closes the round. Those roles can belong to the same person in a small team, but the interface should never make a comment look like an approval.
This matters most when several people join. Ten opinions do not move a campaign forward if nobody knows who can say yes.
A small campaign example
Imagine a launch with a social post, a PDF and a short video. Marketing comments on the headline. Legal marks one sentence in the PDF as required. The client likes the visual direction but waits for the legal change before approving.
The team uploads a new version of the affected files in the same review. Everyone can see what changed and the final decision stays attached to the version that will be published.
When a simpler process is enough
A formal approval flow is unnecessary for every draft. Two teammates sitting together can settle an early sketch in a few minutes. The structured review becomes useful when work leaves the room, crosses teams, needs a client decision, or may need to be checked again later.
The point is not to add steps. It is to stop rebuilding the history from messages whenever a question comes back.
Questions people ask before setting up the workflow
Does a client need an account to review creative work?
Not always. A controlled review link can open the right file and collect the identity required by the project. The link should respect the reviewer’s role and be revocable.
Can Slack, email or WhatsApp remain part of the process?
Yes. They work well for notifications. The file, actionable feedback and final decision should remain in the review so the record does not depend on a chat history.
What ends an approval round?
A recorded outcome on the current version: approved, approved with conditions, changes requested or rejected. Silence should not count as approval unless that rule was explicitly agreed.












